What if Instagram cared about protecting digital artists and their art credits?

With minimal credit protection and the rise of AI-generated content, artists are increasingly vulnerable. What if something could be done?

ROLE

UX/UI Designer

PROJECT

Art Credit Protection Feature

DURATION

4 weeks

YEAR

2025

CHALLENGE

Seamlessly integrate a robust credit protection feature on Instagram to make digital artists feel supported and protected when posting their art online

SOLUTION

Meet "Instagram Credits,"
A New Feature to Safeguard Artists' Work

A set of new Instagram features designed to protect artists by properly crediting artists and restricting unauthorized use with anti-AI technology.

DEFINING THE PROBLEM

Digital Art Is In Grave Danger

Original creator

VS

VS

AI-generated

In a digital age, it is a common occurrence for artists to get the artwork they spent days or weeks on to get stolen or inappropriately used. Users on social media platforms, designed for rapid sharing, frequently remove watermarks or fail to give creators the recognition they deserve. Many also illegally use their art for their own profit, selling products and taking credit without the original artist's consent.


This issue not only undermines the value of their labor but also facilitates unauthorized use, impacting their livelihood and discouraging artistic innovation online. Currently, there are little to no accessible solutions for small, independent visual artists to protect themselves against the nonconsensual use of their art.

Image: Vicky Leta from Business Insider

Image: Vicky Leta from Business Insider

Moreover, the rise of AI-generated art is causing lots of worry within the art community as their work is now at risk of being stolen for unauthorized use in AI models, oftentimes copying their unique art styles and making profit off of it.

RESEARCH & INSIGHTS

Empathizing with Digital Artists

To start tackling such a major complicated issue, I first need to learn more about digital artists. Some immediate points of concern include:

Research Objectives

Research Methodology

1

How and where digital artists post their work

User Interviews

2

Their general needs and pain points as digital artists

User Interviews

3

Their thoughts and experiences with art credits and theft

User Interviews

4

Their thoughts and experiences with AI-generated art

User Interviews

5

Existing tools to protect digital artists and their work

Competitive Analysis

Research Objectives

1

How and where digital artists post their work

2

Their general needs and pain points as digital artists

3

Their thoughts and experiences with art credits and theft

4

Their thoughts and experiences with AI-generated art

5

Existing tools to protect digital artists and their work

Research Methodology

User Interviews

Competitive Analysis

This brought me to my research methodologies. I figured I could personally inquire more about the experiences and pain points of artists by interviewing them directly. To learn more about existing tools, I would also need to conduct a competitive analysis to see if there is even a need or gap in the market for this solution.

Competitive Analysis

Noting each other the competitor's unique talent propositions, I came to a conclusion about the market:


Existing art-sharing platforms lack efficient and accessible mechanisms for identifying art theft, safeguarding original work, and enforcing artists' copyright protections.

I then conducted user interviews with four artists to understand (1) their process, (2) their pain points, (3) their thoughts and experiences with art credits and theft, and (4) their thoughts on AI-generated art.

JA

"I've had a lot of art friends who grew a large following, but they've had issues with getting their art stolen or seeing it posted on spam accounts."

"I would see her art in on some platforms, for example, on Shein, they would put the art on a tote bag or something, and just sell that tote bag that has her art on… It's so terrible how people would just take her art like that."

SU

W

"People sometimes take things and they'll edit them or use them for things that they haven't been given permission for. And oftentimes people don't think anything of it, it's more of like an etiquette thing"

JA

"I've had a lot of art friends who grew a large following, but they've had issues with getting their art stolen or seeing it posted on spam accounts."

"I would see her art in on some platforms, for example, on Shein, they would put the art on a tote bag or something, and just sell that tote bag that has her art on… It's so terrible how people would just take her art like that."

SU

W

"People sometimes take things and they'll edit them or use them for things that they haven't been given permission for. And oftentimes people don't think anything of it, it's more of like an etiquette thing"

After hearing from the artists themselves, I found many frequent patterns in their responses. I noted my key observations of each interview on sticky notes and proceeded to organize them by their general topics. With these categories, I was able take away a number of insights about digital artists.

Moreover, I felt that there was more to note with the tone and behaviors of my interviewees beyond the transcript, so I elected to use an empathy map to better understand what they might be thinking or feeling.

My synthesis led me to define two core types of digital artists who would be the target users of this feature

User Personas

Overall, I found that art communities online are generally very supportive and respectful. Respecting art credits are a complicated form of etiquette in the art community. However, almost every one of my participants have seen art stolen online frequently. Few are affected, but art theft remains a big issue that frustrates both artist and follower.


As for AI art, all artists do not like AI-generated art and find it offensive to their craft. Most are extremely concerned with what it will do to traditional and digital art. Many also admit that there is a significant lack of protection for artists’ credits in the use of AI generated art.

Big Artists Need Protection

Professional creators who make money off of their art are the ones who need their credits protected because they are the ones most likely to get their art stolen. 

People Value Art & Community

Art enthusiasts online would like to see artists given appropriate accreditation because they value the work artists put into their art and the community artists give them.

People See Their Frustration

Art enthusiasts online would like to see more protections against stolen art because they often see the distress and frustration their artists go through when their art is stolen.

Issue of Etiquette

The majority of the art community finds the issue of stolen art to be an issue of respect and etiquette as opposed to a major issue that needs to be enforced.

Complicated Issue

The issue of art theft is very complicated and cannot be simplified into simple right and wrong because it depends a lot on whether users meant to steal or not, the amount of money involved, conflicts of real ownership, and the boundaries of the artists.

AI-generated Art

Artists want to identify and trivialize the use of AI generated art because they believe it devalues the human touch of traditional and digital art, which all artists cherish.

Screenshotting

People in the art community find screenshotting to be one of the biggest problem for the issue of art theft because it is one of the easiest ways for people to take art and crop out credits.

GOALS & OBJECTIVES

User Satisfaction Meets Business Goals

At this stage, I knew I wanted this feature on Instagram because my research showed that Instagram is the most popular art-sharing platform that artists use and also experience the most problems with art theft.

Business Goal

Introduce a successful feature that would increase existing user satisfaction with added security and trust in our product

Introduce a successful feature that would increase existing user satisfaction with added security and trust in our product

Introduce a successful feature that would increase existing user satisfaction with added security and trust in our product

User Goal

Protect their art from getting stolen or misused online with more control over where their art goes online

Protect their art from getting stolen or misused online with more control over where their art goes online

Protect their art from getting stolen or misused online with more control over where their art goes online

Technical Limitations

The usability and effectiveness of art detection, tamper-proof and metadata-embedded watermarking, and anti-AI tools

The usability and effectiveness of art detection, tamper-proof and metadata-embedded watermarking, and anti-AI tools

The usability and effectiveness of art detection, tamper-proof and metadata-embedded watermarking, and anti-AI tools

Gaining the trust of artists to use AI to combat AI-generated art

Gaining the trust of artists to use AI to combat AI-generated art

Gaining the trust of artists to use AI to combat AI-generated art

Sustaining demand and usage of a safety tool on a single platform

Sustaining demand and usage of a safety tool on a single platform

Sustaining demand and usage of a safety tool on a single platform

Project Goal

Create a functional and seamless feature launch that reassures creators that their art is credited to them and protected, encouraging art creation and business growth

Create a functional and seamless feature launch that reassures creators that their art is credited to them and protected, encouraging art creation and business growth

FEATURE PRIORITIZATION

Protecting Art Credits with a Security Feature on Instagram

To define which features would best meet user needs while aligning with project constraints, I compiled a formative feature set informed by user research insights. Then, I prioritized features into an Impact-Effort Matrix to evaluate which features would deliver the most value with reasonable development effort, helping to guide a focused and strategic MVP.

Prioritized feature roadmap with integrated Impact-Effort matrix

Prioritized feature roadmap with integrated Impact-Effort matrix

After ideating and prioritizing the features, I selected four of the features that I would have the highest impact for users as well as be lower effort to develop:

1

Creator Tag

An image uploaded and posted to Instagram with Credits on will be specially coded to link to the Creator’s profile in the image’s metadata. This means that if the image is reposted on any Meta platform, there will be a new Creator Tag that is automatically added to the Tag People Section so Creators will have to be credited whenever their art is used.

2

Anti-AI Image Effects

Creators also have the option to turn on anti-AI effects for their uploaded image. Before posting, Creators can protect and poison their uploaded image so AI models cannot steal the art style and instead confuse it (See new anti-AI technology, Nightshade and Glade).

3

Screenshot Lock

To protect the Creator Tag, any post with Credits on cannot be screenshotted and will instead be locked. Users can instead save the image into their camera roll. This image will have a Creator-designated watermark. Creators can choose to use an Instagram-default watermark (similar to TikTok’s watermark) or upload their own custom watermark and place it on the image.

4

Custom Watermark

Creators have the option to upload a custom watermark or use a default one to add to a post. They can scale it, move it, or change the opacity to their liking. Once done, they have the option to place it anywhere on the post.

USER FLOWS

Seamless Integration Enables Ease of Use

With research insights and project goals in mind, I began mapping out user flows and outlining where the individual features in the feature set would be implemented on the app.

1

Creating a Post for Creators

2

Customizing a Watermark for Creators

3

Customizing a Creator Tag for Creators

4

Reporting Copyright Infringement

5

Screenshot Lock & Downloading Image

THE PRODUCT MVP

A set of new Instagram features designed to protect artists by properly crediting artists and restricting unauthorized use with anti-AI technology.

Usability Test Results

7 participants

4 task flows

100%

100%

task success rate

task success rate

9.9/10

9.9/10

avg usability score

avg usability score

Overall, users found the main task flows, such as discovering and reviewing workspaces, intuitive and easy to follow.

However, some confusion arose around placement of anti-AI image effects, which prompted a need for clearer onboarding and contextual explanation

Key Iterations:

Added modals to the post creation flow to clarify the location and function of anti-AI image effects

Included more visual confirmation after the watermark customization flow to reduce user confusion

Added additional screens for external links and feature explanations to reduce user confusion

Included more visual guidance towards the location of Credit Tools

Lessons Learned

01

User-first design

After talking to digital artists, I saw that art theft is a deeply personal violation for artists that can impact their livelihoods and sense of agency. This made me want to design features that weren’t just functional but purposeful. It reinforced that user-first design isn’t about asking “What can we build?” but “What really matters to the people we’re building for?”

02

Empathetic Research

While interviews and transcripts were important, many of my most impactful insights came from how participants spoke with their tone of voice and body language. By creating empathy maps and observing behavior alongside dialogue, I was able to design with a much fuller picture of what artists were experiencing.

03

Decisiveness

There were moments where this problem felt too big. I could have easily ended up stuck in endless iterations. But setting clear priorities grounded in user insights helped me move forward with confidence. Knowing when to pivot, when to simplify, and when to commit was just as important as the ideas themselves.

Beyond the MVP

Phase 2

Post Tracking Analytics

For Phase 2, I would add a feature that would allow users to track where their art is being reposted and shared, possibly with reverse image search tools.

Phase 3

Protection for All Arts & Crafts

For Phase 3, I would add a feature that would also protect other forms of art like traditional art and crafts that are also vulnerable to art theft online.

Janus Kwong

januskwong@gmail.com

LinkedIn

Resume